
doi: 10.1007/bfb0052322
The question is addressed whether the linguistic phenomenon of anaphora exists in multimodal dialogue. Anaphora is contrasted with deixis and ellipsis as being an essentially co-referential phenomenon; it is argued that existing discussions in the areas of HCI and presentation generation, e.g. by Singer and Wahlster, have failed to demonstrate multimodal anaphora. This is argued to be because the ‘token-referential’ nature of graphics (as opposed to the ‘type-referential’ nature of language) means that identification and predication can't be separated; hence graphics tends to be ‘unfocussed’, and re-identification of refeerents for further predication does not happen.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
