Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
https://doi.org/10.1...arrow_drop_down
https://doi.org/10.1007/bfb004...
Part of book or chapter of book . 1996 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
DBLP
Conference object
Data sources: DBLP
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Enhancement of MR images

Authors: Régis Guillemaud; Michael Brady 0001;

Enhancement of MR images

Abstract

We propose a modification of Wells' et. al. technique for bias field estimation and segmentation of MR images. Replacement of the class other that includes all tissue not modeled explicitly by Gaussians with small variance by a uniform probability density, and amending the EM algorithm appropriately, gives significantly better results. The performance of any segmentation algorithm is affected substantially by the number and selection of the tissue classes that are modeled explicitly, the corresponding defining parameters, and, critically, the spatial distribution of tissues in the image. We present an initial exploration of the application of minimum entropy to choose automatically the number of classes and the associated parameters that give the best output.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!