
doi: 10.1007/bfb0046943
We propose a modification of Wells' et. al. technique for bias field estimation and segmentation of MR images. Replacement of the class other that includes all tissue not modeled explicitly by Gaussians with small variance by a uniform probability density, and amending the EM algorithm appropriately, gives significantly better results. The performance of any segmentation algorithm is affected substantially by the number and selection of the tissue classes that are modeled explicitly, the corresponding defining parameters, and, critically, the spatial distribution of tissues in the image. We present an initial exploration of the application of minimum entropy to choose automatically the number of classes and the associated parameters that give the best output.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
