
doi: 10.1007/bfb0045094
In this paper we begin by describing two currently used methods for evaluating phylogenetic trees, one proposed by Fitch and Margoliash [5] and the other proposed by Saitou and Nei [7]. Both methods are heuristic in the sense that not all possible trees are tested to ensure that the best solution has been reached. We develop a matrix representation of unrooted binary trees. The problem of evaluating phylogenetic trees is then transformed into the standard linear least squares problem. Then we propose a matrix decomposition method for evaluating phylogenetic trees.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
