
doi: 10.1007/bfb0030635
Much research in axiomatic semantics suffers from a lack of formality. In particular, most proposed verification calculi for imperative programs dealing with recursive procedures are known to be unsound or incomplete. Focussing on total correctness, we present a new consequence rule which yields a sound and complete Hoare-style calculus in the presence of parameterless recursive procedures. Both, the standard consequence and an improved rule of adaptation are instances of our new rule. This work has been developed under the auspices of the computer-aided proof system Lego. The rigorous treatment of auxiliary variables has been crucial for establishing our results. A comparison with VDM reinforces our view that auxiliary variables deserve to be treated seriously.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
