
We examine the average running times of Batcher's bitonic merge and Batcher's odd-even merge when they are used as parallel merging algorithms. It has been shown previously that the running time of odd-even merge can be upper bounded by a function of the maximal rank difference for elements in the two input sequences. Here we give an almost matching lower bound for odd-even merge as well as a similar upper bound for (a special version of) bitonic merge. From this follows that the average running time of odd-even merge (bitonic merge) is Θ((n/p)(1+log(1+p 2/n))) (O((n/p)(1+log(1+p 2/n))), resp.) where n is the size of the input and p is the number of processors. Using these results we then show that the average running times of odd-even merge sort and bitonic merge sort are O((n/p) (log n + (log(1 +p2/n))2)), that is, the two algorithms are optimal on the average if \(n \geqslant p^2 /2^{\sqrt {\log p} }\).
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
