Physical conditions in prominences

T. Hirayama

Found an issue? Give us feedback

https://doi.org/10.1...arrow_drop_down

https://doi.org/10.1007/bfb002...

Part of book or chapter of book . 2005 . Peer-reviewed

Data sources: Crossref

https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bfb...

Other literature type

Data sources: Microsoft Academic Graph

Physical conditions in prominences

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Part of book or chapter of book , Other literature type 19 Nov 2005 English Publisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Authors: T. Hirayama;

doi: 10.1007/bfb0025649

Physical conditions in prominences

- Summary
- Metrics

Abstract

As a summary of this paper I am presenting a table which is in a very similar format as I have presented in the former IAU colloquium (Hirayama, 1978), and according change was made. Though the present study did not cover much about post flare loops, and erupting prominences (and nothing was said on surges and active region filaments), they are also included for comparison.

Related Organizations

National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
Japan

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	7
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 10%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%