
doi: 10.1007/bfb0023936
Most people would agree that a formalisation of granularity in natural language should involve notions of abstraction and detail. However in reality, this concept has proved difficult to capture formally. In this paper we examine the role of granularity in constructing explanations. This role is clarified by providing several dimensions along which any explanation task can be characterised. We argue that a combination of these dimensions can be used to define a notion of coherence in texts. This notion of coherence gives rise to search heuristics when solving nontrivial language engineering problems such as reference resolution.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
