
doi: 10.1007/bfb0014182
A common limitation of all the existing nested transaction models is that they only allow subtransactions to commit either to parent transactions or to databases. In order to adequately balance atomicity and concurrency at selected levels of a transaction hierarchy, the notion of scoped commitment is proposed, that allows a subtransaction to commit to a selected ancestor independently of its parent, making its results visible to that ancestor and thus improving the concurrency in the transaction subtree beneath that ancestor. A corresponding scoped undo approach is also developed that allows a transaction hierarchy with subtransactions having mixed commit scopes to partially and consistently roll back upon failure, then restart and roll forward.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
