
doi: 10.1007/bf03396891
handle: 10419/57356
We study the market quality of the Xetra BEST system operated by Deutsche Borse AG, an internalization system designed as part of an open limit order book, which guarantees a price improvement over the inside spread in the Xetra order book. We develop a structural model of this dual market environment and show that adverse selection costs of internalized trades are significantly lower than those of regular order book trades while realized spreads are significantly larger. The cost savings of the internalizer are larger than the mandatory price improvement, suggesting that internalization can be profitable for both customer and internalizer.
330, ddc:330, Execution Quality, Elektronisches Handelssystem, Wertpapierhandel, Internalization,Execution Quality,Adverse Selection Costs, Adverse Selection Costs, Bid-Ask Spread, Deutsche Börse, G10, Aktienmarkt, Deutschland, Adverse Selection, Theorie, Xetra-Handelssystem, Internalization, jel: jel:G10
330, ddc:330, Execution Quality, Elektronisches Handelssystem, Wertpapierhandel, Internalization,Execution Quality,Adverse Selection Costs, Adverse Selection Costs, Bid-Ask Spread, Deutsche Börse, G10, Aktienmarkt, Deutschland, Adverse Selection, Theorie, Xetra-Handelssystem, Internalization, jel: jel:G10
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
