
doi: 10.1007/bf03342728
handle: 10419/103699 , 10419/37113
AbstractThis paper treats the problem of setting the inventory level and optimizing the buffer allocation of closed-loop flow lines operating under the constant-work-in-process (CONWIP) protocol. We solve a very large but simple linear program that models an entire simulation run of a closed-loop flow line in discrete time to determine a production rate estimate of the system. This approach introduced in Helber, Schimmelpfeng, Stolletz, and Lagershausen (2011) for open flow lines with limited buffer capacities is extended to closed-loop CONWIP flow lines. Via this method, both the CONWIP level and the buffer allocation can be optimized simultaneously. The first part of a numerical study deals with the accuracy of the method. In the second part, we focus on the relationship between the CONWIP inventory level and the short-term profit. The accuracy of the method turns out to be best for such configurations that maximize production rate and/or short-term profit.
Fließfertigung, CONWIP, flow lines, random processing times, performance evaluation, buffer allocation, linear programming, simulation., ddc:330, Performance-Messung, ddc:650, linear programming, Mathematische Optimierung, 650, Lagerhaltungsmodell, CONWIP, inventory, C61, flow lines, Betriebliche Lagerhaltung, Fertigungssteuerung, Theorie, jel: jel:C61
Fließfertigung, CONWIP, flow lines, random processing times, performance evaluation, buffer allocation, linear programming, simulation., ddc:330, Performance-Messung, ddc:650, linear programming, Mathematische Optimierung, 650, Lagerhaltungsmodell, CONWIP, inventory, C61, flow lines, Betriebliche Lagerhaltung, Fertigungssteuerung, Theorie, jel: jel:C61
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
