
doi: 10.1007/bf03043598
pmid: 9816519
The risk of restenosis, main late effect limiting the success of percutaneous transluminal coronary artery angioplasty, can be reduced significantly by vascular radiotherapy, subsequent to PTCA. This discovery lead to the development of new irradiation techniques. Endovascular brachytherapy is the choice in treatment of coronary artery stenosis. Successful irradiation, however, requires precise treatment planning. This review addresses the physical possibilities and problems of intravascular brachytherapy planning, and the radiobiologically based definition of the target volume and of structures at risk. Recommendations for dose specification, recording and reporting are given. The criteria for selecting a vascular radiotherapy technique are discussed as well as the possibilities of dosimetric treatment planning and quality assurance based on precise plastic scintillator dosimetry and intravascular ultrasound. Radiation protection and safety must be reconsidered prior to the usage of therapeutic radiation sources in the catheter laboratory and for the decision about emergency plans. Finally, the design of clinical trials, the role of medical physicists, and the future of irradiation treatment of stenosis is discussed.
Radiation Protection, Recurrence, Brachytherapy, Retreatment, Humans, Coronary Disease, Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary, Patient Care Planning
Radiation Protection, Recurrence, Brachytherapy, Retreatment, Humans, Coronary Disease, Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary, Patient Care Planning
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 20 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
