
doi: 10.1007/bf03037636
Mining frequent patterns with a frequent pattern tree (FP-tree in short) avoids costly candidate generation and repeatedly occurrence frequency checking against the support threshold. It therefore achieves much better performance and efficiency than Apriori-like algorithms. However, the database still needs to be scanned twice to get the FP-tree. This can be very time-consuming when new data is added to an existing database because two scans may be needed for not only the new data but also the existing data. In this research we propose a new data structure, the pattern tree (P-tree in short), and a new technique, which can get the P-tree through only one scan of the database and can obtain the corresponding FP-tree with a specified support threshold. Updating a P-tree with new data needs one scan of the new data only, and the existing data does not need to be re-scanned. Our experiments show that the P-tree method outperforms the FP-tree method by a factor up to an order of magnitude in large datasets.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
