
doi: 10.1007/bf03029409
pmid: 12314996
Although it is customary to regard the statistical product of modern nation-states as being composed of two broad categories, social statistics and economic statistics, this paper emphasizes the links rather than the dividing lines between statistical programmes. It traces the attempts of three statistician economists to classify and quantify “national accounts” and “vital statistics” and show the interrelationships between the two. Their efforts suggest certain guidelines for today’s statisticians: apply the art of classification to create order out of chaos, know your users’ requirements, possess objectivity and impartiality and finally, let your deductions follow your facts, not precede them.
Vital Statistics, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Data Collection, Developed Countries, Research, Australia, Population Characteristics, Pacific Islands, Developing Countries
Vital Statistics, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Data Collection, Developed Countries, Research, Australia, Population Characteristics, Pacific Islands, Developing Countries
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
