Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Canadian Journal of ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie
Article . 2005 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
Anesthesiology
Article . 2005 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
Anesthesiology
Article . 2005
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

A lesson learned

Authors: Karen C. Nielsen; Ulrich Guller; Susan M. Steele; Stephen M. Klein; Roy A. Greengrass; Ricardo Pietrobon;

A lesson learned

Abstract

Reply to MS #200503055 Thank you for giving us this opportunity to respond. We wish to apologize to the editorial staff and readership of Anesthesiology1 and the Canadian Journal of Anesthesia.2 In October 2004 we published a study in the Canadian Journal of Anesthesia and in January 2005 we published another article in Anesthesiology. At the time of the Anesthesiology submission we failed to notify the journal of the existence of the prior paper which utilized the same dataset and had similar methodology. Although the paper in Anesthesiology expanded upon the findings reported in the Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, this is inconsistent with our acknowledgement of the Instructions for Authors which states "Submitted manuscripts must not have been published elsewhere, in whole or in part...". We realize that journals must take this issue seriously. It is necessary to maintain integrity and provide the peer review process the complete information to thoroughly evaluate a manuscript and arrive at the optimal decision. While not intended to hide the existence of another manuscript our actions did not allow this process to occur. We take the issue of academic integrity seriously. We are sincerely sorry for causing this situation.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Duplicate Publications as Topic, Ambulatory Surgical Procedures, Anesthesia, Conduction, Humans, Obesity, Periodicals as Topic, Editorial Policies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    7
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
7
Average
Top 10%
Average
bronze