Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Immunologic Researcharrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Immunologic Research
Article . 1989 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Antigen presenting cells

Authors: Daniel L. Hamilos;

Antigen presenting cells

Abstract

A great deal has been learned over the past few years regarding the molecular biology of antigen presentation. These discoveries have been possible in part because of acquisition of protein sequencing data regarding class I and class II MHC molecules and in part because of X-ray crystallographic analysis of the three-dimensional structures of these molecules. These discoveries have merged nicely with detailed immunologic studies delineating the 'minimal antigenic peptides' of complex protein antigens. All of these studies strongly confirm the belief that the antigen-specific interaction of T cells with antigen in the context of antigen presenting cells is exquisitely specific. The process of 'trimolecular complex' formation involves binding interactions between antigenic peptide, class I or class II MHC molecules and the antigen-specific T cell receptor. One of the key functions of antigen presenting cells involves the 'processing' of complex protein antigens so as to allow for the interaction of the 'minimal antigenic peptide' with the appropriate class I or class II MHC molecule. A substantial body of evidence now indicates that the interaction of processed antigenic peptides and class II MHC molecules involves a binding interaction with a significant binding affinity and a slow dissociation constant. In addition to antigen-specific binding interactions which govern antigen presentation, there are a variety of antigen-independent and MHC-independent factors which greatly augment the process of antigen presentation. Along with differences in antigen processing, these factors probably account for the qualitative and quantitative differences seen between the various cell types involved in antigen presentation. There may be a substantial amount of antigen which associates with the antigen presenting cell surface in an MHC-independent fashion associated with so-called 'non-MHC peptide binding structures'. However, if the trimolecular complex theory is to be satisfied, antigen bound to these structures ultimately must become associated with the MHC restricting element in order to effectively engage the antigen-specific T cell receptor. Antigen presenting cells differ in their sensitivity to lymphokines and inflammatory mediators which augment antigen presentation. In addition, antigen presenting cells differ in their capacity to secrete or express membrane-bound costimulatory molecules, such as interleukin 1. Finally, factors which promote the cellular adherence of antigen presenting cells with T cells greatly augment the process of antigen presentation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Keywords

Mice, T-Lymphocytes, Guinea Pigs, Histocompatibility Antigens Class I, Histocompatibility Antigens Class II, Animals, Antigen-Presenting Cells, Humans

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    33
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
33
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!