
doi: 10.1007/bf02913149
pmid: 11481837
We studied immediate and mid-term results after aortic valve repair.Immediate and mid-term results were studied in 63 patients undergoing aortic valve repair, calculating survival and reoperation free rates.Subjects were 49 men and 14 women aged 15 to 76 years (mean: 53 +/- 17 years). Mean preoperative aortic regurgitation grading of 1 to 4 was 3.2 +/- 0.7. Mean preoperative New York Heart Association functional class was 1.9 +/- 0.8. Two in-hospital deaths occurred. (3.2%) Mean aortic regurgitation grade at discharge was 1.3 +/- 0.8 (p < 0.0001; vs preoperative grade) and functional class was 1.1 +/- 0.2 (p < 0.0001; vs preoperative class),--significantly improved. Overall follow-up was 98.4%, and mean follow-up continued 41.4 +/- 22.1 months. Mean functional class at follow-up was 1.2 +/- 0.4 (n = 49), improved from preoperative class (p < 0.0001). Mean aortic regurgitation grading at follow-up was 1.8 +/- 0.8 (n = 41), improved from preoperative grading (p < 0.0001). Five-year survival was 95.1 +/- 2.8%. One-year reoperation freedom was 96.6 +/- 2.4% and 5-year 77.9 +/- 6.9%.Survival after surgery was good, while reoperation was comparable to other reports but less satisfactory compared to reoperation freedom after aortic valve replacement. Based on reoperative findings, a change in indication was made. We believe technical refinements could improve postoperative results.
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Aortic Valve Insufficiency, Stroke Volume, Middle Aged, Ventricular Function, Left, Survival Rate, Aortic Valve, Humans, Female, Echocardiography, Transesophageal, Aged
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Aortic Valve Insufficiency, Stroke Volume, Middle Aged, Ventricular Function, Left, Survival Rate, Aortic Valve, Humans, Female, Echocardiography, Transesophageal, Aged
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
