
doi: 10.1007/bf02911652
In an earlier paper [3] the authors gave a characterization of the Wiener process by the property that a stochastic integral\(\int_A^B {a\left( t \right)dX\left( t \right)} \) (taken in the sense of convergence in the quadratic mean) has the same distribution as α[X(t+1)−X(t)]. The assumption that the integral was defined in the sense of convergence in the quadratic mean necessitated a number of hypotheses; for instance one had to suppose that the process was of the second order and that its mean value function and its covariance function were of bounded variation.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
