Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao La Ricerca in Clinic...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
La Ricerca in Clinica e in Laboratorio
Article . 1989 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Screening for the lupus anticoagulant

Authors: D A, Triplett;

Screening for the lupus anticoagulant

Abstract

The lupus anticoagulant may be defined as an immunoglobulin (IgG, IgM or both) which interferes with one or more of the in vitro phospholipid-dependent tests of coagulation. For many years, lupus anticoagulants were regarded as a laboratory nuisance; consequently, reagents were often selected on the basis of insensitivity to lupus anticoagulants. Recently, lupus anticoagulants have been associated with a variety of clinical conditions including recurrent thromboembolic events (both arterial and venous), obstetrical complications including fetal death and spontaneous abortion, and a variety of hematologic and neurologic complications. As a result, many laboratories are now being asked to identify the presence of lupus anticoagulants in selected patient populations. In addition to assays for lupus anticoagulants, there are immunologic assays designed to detect phospholipid antibodies using solid phase systems (RIA or ELISA). A variety of screening tests have been designed to enhance sensitivity to lupus anticoagulants. Test systems with decreased amounts of phospholipid (phosphatidylserine) appear to be most sensitive to lupus anticoagulants. Of the various tests used, the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) appears to be most sensitive. The sensitivity of any screening test system is inversely proportional to the residual platelets in the patient sample. APTT reagents differ widely in their sensitivity to lupus anticoagulants. The dilute Russell viper venom time is also highly dependent on the choice and concentration of phospholipid with respect to its sensitivity. Once an abnormality of a screening test has been identified, it is necessary to prove the abnormal result is due to the presence of an inhibitor. This step in the diagnosis may utilize either mixing studies or plasma agarose gels. The final step in the diagnosis of lupus anticoagulants is the demonstration of phospholipid specificity of the inhibitor. Two approaches have been utilized: 1. test systems designed to enhance anticoagulant effect (phospholipid-depleted), and 2. test systems with increased or altered phospholipids which will bypass or neutralize the anticoagulant.

Related Organizations
Keywords

International Cooperation, Lupus Coagulation Inhibitor, Prothrombin Time, Humans, Immunoglobulins, Partial Thromboplastin Time, Blood Coagulation Tests, Blood Coagulation Factors, Phospholipids

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    36
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
36
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!