Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Advances in Therapyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Advances in Therapy
Article . 2005 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

VEGF-C expression in breast cancer: Clinical importance

Authors: Yavuz S.; Paydas S.; Disel U.; Zorludemir S.; Erdogan S.;

VEGF-C expression in breast cancer: Clinical importance

Abstract

It is well known that angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis play important roles in tumor occurrence and progression. The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) family is the most important family of proteins involved in angiogenesis, and VEGF-C is the most important molecule in lymphangiogenesis. Lymphangiogenesis plays an important role in lymphovascular invasion, metastasis to regional lymph nodes, and distant organ metastasis. In this study, the rate of VEGF-C was investigated in 217 patients with breast cancer. VEGF-C was evaluated by immunohistochemistry and its expression was compared with that of well-known prognostic indicators, such as tumor stage and grade, axillary lymph node involvement, estrogen and progesterone receptor status, c-erb-B2 expression, and extent of lymphovascular invasion. The patient population included 8 men, in addition to women before (n=108), during (n=9), and after (n=92) menopause. Patients had been diagnosed with invasive ductal (n=181) or invasive lobular (n=22) carcinoma, mixed (n=8) or medullary (n=1) carcinoma, or ductal carcinoma in situ (n=5). Tumors ranged from stage 0 to IV and grade I to III and the distribution of estrogen-positive (n=100) and estrogen-negative (n=110) receptor tumors was almost equal. The number of patients with c-erbB2 tumors ranged from 21 to 49 for each tumor stage, and the number of patients with VEGF-C-negative tumors ranged from 28 to 59 for each tumor stage. No important association between VEGF-C expression and other prognostic indicators was found. However, this may be a result of the lack of standardization among the methods used to determine VEGF-C expression. Also, the lymphangiogenic effect may not be overt because of the variety of VEGFR-3 variants, which included nonfunctional variants. To determine the relationship among angiogenesis, lymphangiogenesis, and prognosis, more standardized methods to demonstrate the angiogenesis, and prospective studies to cover a larger, more homogenous patient population are needed.

Country
Turkey
Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor C, VEGF-C, Breast Neoplasms, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Immunohistochemistry, Breast Neoplasms, Male, Breast cancer, Lymphatic Metastasis, Biomarkers, Tumor, Humans, Female, Angiogenesis, Lymphangiogenesis, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    12
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
12
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!