
doi: 10.1007/bf02828653
We demonstrate the flaws of Mao's method, which is an augmentation of protocol idealization in BAN-like logics, and then offer some new idealization rules based on Mao's method. Furthermore, we give some theoretical analysis of our rules using the strand space formalism, and show the soundness of our idealization rules under strand spaces. Some examples on using the new rules to analyze security protocols are also concerned. Our idealization method is more effective than Mao's method towards many protocol instances, and is supported by a formal model.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
