
doi: 10.1007/bf02826944
This paper attempts to regard spatial relation transformation as an important process in map generalization. The spatial relation generalization can be divided into the components of abstraction: topology, disttance and orientation. The concept ‘spatial relation resolution’ is introduced to describe the constraints of relative spatial relation. On the basis of nine intersection models, the cardinal direction models and the iso-distance-relation models, this paper gives three sorts of relation resolution representations for topological, distance and orientation relation, respectively. Two mapping implementations in map generalization is discussed.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
