
doi: 10.1007/bf02723945
pmid: 11262983
The antipyretic effect of nimesulide has not been adequately compared with paracetamol and ibuprofen-paracetamol combination in children. Hence, a randomized, double blind, and parallel groups' design and multicenter study was conducted on children with respiratory tract infections. Eighty-nine patients with temperatures above 38.5 degrees C were randomly administered nimesulide (1.5 mg/kg/dose), paracetamol (10.0 mg/kg/dose), or ibuprofen-patients combination (10.0 mg/kg/dose), thrice daily for five days. The axillary temperature was recorded at the baseline and at different time intervals post administration of drugs. The hematological and biochemical investigations were performed at the basal level and at the end of the treatment period. The adverse drug reactions were monitored during the trial. All the drugs produced a significant fall in temperature as compared to their respective basal values (p < 0.001). However, on looking at the change in temperatures at different time intervals from the respective basal levels, no significant difference was found among all the drugs. Surprisingly, nimesulide had a tendency to raise serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase and serum glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase levels as compared to its baseline values. There was no marked adverse effect of the drugs on other hematological and biochemical parameters investigated. No other serious adverse reaction occurred in the study. Ibuprofen-paracetamol combination, nimesulide, and paracetamol had almost similar antipyretic effects in children.
Male, Sulfonamides, Fever, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal, Infant, Ibuprofen, Drug Combinations, Double-Blind Method, Child, Preschool, Humans, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Acetaminophen
Male, Sulfonamides, Fever, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal, Infant, Ibuprofen, Drug Combinations, Double-Blind Method, Child, Preschool, Humans, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Acetaminophen
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 29 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
