<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

Comparing dynamic contour tonometry to Goldmann and hand-held tonometry in normal, ocular hypertension, and glaucoma populations

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 Mar 2007Publisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLCJournal:Annals of Ophthalmology, volume 39, pages 41-49 (issn: 1530-4086, eissn: 1558-9951,

Authors: Mihaly Mezej; Kenneth D. Eichenbaum; Joseph W. Eichenbaum;

doi: 10.1007/bf02697325

pmid: 17914204

Comparing dynamic contour tonometry to Goldmann and hand-held tonometry in normal, ocular hypertension, and glaucoma populations

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

We prospectively compared dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) to Goldmann (GAT) and hand-held tonometry (HHT) in normal, ocular hypertension, and glaucoma populations. Both measurements were made on each patient within a 5-minute period during routine office exams over 4 months. While DCT is in good overall agreement with GAT and HTT, there is some systematic deviation at different pressure ranges in normal, ocular hypertension, and glaucoma populations.

Related Organizations

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
United States

Keywords

Cohort Studies, Tonometry, Ocular, Humans, Glaucoma, Ocular Hypertension, Prospective Studies, Intraocular Pressure

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	4
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average

Found an issue? Give us feedback

Average

Fields of Science

medical and health sciences

clinical medicine

Fields of Science

medical and health sciences

clinical medicine

Upload OA version

Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?

uploadUpload now!