
doi: 10.1007/bf02691335
pmid: 7811651
The number and variety of methods used in dynamical analysis has increased dramatically during the last fifteen years, and the limitations of these methods, especially when applied to noisy biological data, are now becoming apparent. Their misapplication can easily produce fallacious results. The purpose of this introduction is to identify promising new methods and to describe safeguards that can be used to protect against false conclusions.
Models, Statistical, Nonlinear Dynamics, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Animals, Humans, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Models, Biological
Models, Statistical, Nonlinear Dynamics, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Animals, Humans, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Models, Biological
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 63 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
