
doi: 10.1007/bf02650673
Due to the limitation of the data, theβ value of seismic zones have been determined by the historical seismic data at the present seismic hazard analysis. Because of lacking of historical documents, many moderate historical events were not recorded and the determined seismicity parameters have shown the uncertainty. It is difficult to describe the temporal inhomogeneous of the seismicity by the instrumental observation data with short time. This paper used the maximum likelihood method to joint two data with different precision and duration, which brings each superiority into play and overcomes each shortcoming. Therefore, it is possible for results to have more actual significance. The method for the estimation of the uncertainty and the sensitive analysis of these parameters have been shown. It might provide other way for estimation of the parameters in the seismic hazard analysis.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
