Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Management of imperforate anus

Authors: P H, HANLEY; M O, HINES; J E, RAY;

Management of imperforate anus

Abstract

Experience with 89 cases of imperforate anus treated at Charity Hospital of New Orleans and the Ochsner Clinic has emphasized the importance of more standardized management of this anomaly. The importance of the observation period in determining the best plan of treatment has been stressed. Imperforate anus has been classified into four types. The surgical procedure to be employed depends on the type of anomaly, the associated anomalies and the degree of surgical risk. For type I digital dilation is usually sufficient except in cases of hard fibrotic rings when anoplasty may be required. An intrasphincteric procedure should be performed for type II anomalies. In patients with type III anomalies in which the distance between the rectal pouch and surface of the skin exceeds 1.5 cm., in those with rectovesical, recto-urethral or rectovaginal fistulas above the hymen and in those with type IV anomalies, the abdomino-intrasphincteric pull-through procedure is recommended. The anal sphincter-preserving operation is the procedure of choice for rectovaginal fistulas that open below the hymen into the fossa navicularis and for all rectoperineal fistulas. The success of immediate definitive treatment depends upon the skill of the surgeon, and the presence or absence of prematurity and associated anomalies. The various surgical technics have been described.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Anus, Imperforate, Anal Canal, Disease Management, Humans

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!