Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of General I...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Article . 1992 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

The value of sputum cytology

Authors: B, MacDougall; B, Weinerman;

The value of sputum cytology

Abstract

To assess the value of cytologic examination of expectorated sputum in the diagnosis and management of patients with suspected lung cancer.Retrospective chart review.Inpatient wards, tertiary care university hospital.The charts of 357 patients were reviewed. Two hundred eighty-eight of the 357 patients had had initial sputum cytologic examination prior to other diagnostic procedures, of which 41 (15%) had positive cytologic results. Thirty-six of the 41 were confirmed histologically or shown to have metastatic spread by noninvasive tests. Of the 222 patients with negative or unsatisfactory sputum tests, 97 went on to bronchoscopy and 35 had needle-aspiration biopsies. In the population of patients whose chest x-rays were highly suggestive of primary or metastatic lung cancer, the positive rate for cytologic examination was 38/94 (40%). There was no false-positive test in this study. Of the 50 patients with positive cytologic results, five (10%) had diseases that were of a different cell type; two of these five (40%) had diseases that involved small-cell cancer. There was an unsatisfactory delay in obtaining these samples for analysis.Sputum cytology was found to be too insensitive and insufficiently accurate to be included in the routine workup of a patient suspected of having lung cancer. The results of the test did not influence further diagnostic procedures. This test should, therefore, be reserved for patients considered on initial assessment to be too sick for further investigations and treatment.

Keywords

Lung Neoplasms, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Predictive Value of Tests, Sputum, Humans, Sensitivity and Specificity, Medical Records, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    20
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
20
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!