
doi: 10.1007/bf02598295
pmid: 8120690
PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS ( C o x ) REGRESSION is a powerful analytic tool for testing whe the r several factors (e.g., cigarette smoking, hyper tens ion) are independent ly related to the rate (over t ime) of a specific event (e.g., heart attack yes /no) . It can also be used to control for baseline differences be t ween groups in nonrandomized studies and randomized clinical trials (RCTs). The availabili ty of desktop compute r s and userfr iendly software has resul ted in a marked increase in the use of propor t iona l hazards regression by clinical researchers. However , most detai led reviews of the t echnique 1-5 cannot be unders tood by non-statisticians. In this article we begin wi th a rev iew of s impler types of survival analyses, highl ight ing the concepts of rate of ou t come and censored observations. Building on these two concepts , we descr ibe the statistical propert ies , under lying assumptions, interpretat ion, and applicat ion of propor t iona l hazards regression. Also we describe t ime-dependen t covariates, the use of proport ional hazards regression versus logistic regression, and other technical aspects of propor t iona l hazards regression. Finally, we illustrate the appl icat ions of this techn ique by reviewing 80 articles f rom the New England Journal o f Medicine and the Annals of Internal Medicine that used propor t iona l hazards regression dur ing 1984, 1987, and 1990. Our goal is to enable non-statisticians to in terpret these models and to provide guidelines for clinical researchers per forming this type of analysis.
Clinical Trials as Topic, Logistic Models, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Multivariate Analysis, Humans, Survival Analysis, Proportional Hazards Models
Clinical Trials as Topic, Logistic Models, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Multivariate Analysis, Humans, Survival Analysis, Proportional Hazards Models
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 85 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
