Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Procidentia: Surgical treatment

Authors: O H, Beahrs; F J, Theuerkauf; J R, Hill;

Procidentia: Surgical treatment

Abstract

The surgical experience at the Mayo Clinic with 124 cases of rectal prolapse during the 16 years before December 31, 1967, has been presented. Anterior resection was performed in 28 patients, with one death and one recurrence (3.7 per cent); the Pemberton operation allowed recurrence in 22 of 68 cases (32.4 per cent); recurrence after the Altemeier procedure occurred in five of 13 cases (38.5 per cent). Other operations were of limited application. Combining a review of the surgical literature with our results allowed several conclusions about the efficacy of the various operations for this condition.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Time Factors, Adolescent, Rectal Prolapse, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Postoperative Complications, Recurrence, Methods, Humans, Female, Child, Constipation, Intussusception, Fecal Incontinence, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    31
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
31
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!