
doi: 10.1007/bf02584085
pmid: 9476598
Pattern electroretinograms were recorded to phase-reversing checkerboard stimuli with DTL electrodes under conditions close to those of the ISCEV pattern electroretinogram guidelines. Both transient (2 reversals/s) and steady-state (16 reversals/s) stimulation was used. The check sizes were 0.4 degree, 0.8 degree and 16 degrees; the mean luminance 45 cd/m2, the contrast 98%, and the field size 32 degrees x 27 degrees. In 42 eyes of 21 subjects, measurements were repeated at the same time of day after 1 week. For each eye, the intersession coefficient of variation was calculated as a measure of reproducibility. We found a coefficient of variation (+/- standard deviation) of 7% +/- 5% for the amplitude of the steady-state pattern electroretinogram, 9.5% +/- 7% for the transient pattern electroretinogram and 1.5% +/- 2% for the latency of the transient pattern electroretinogram. To assess the diurnal variability, during a 15-h period, three pattern electroretinograms were recorded in 10 subjects. No relationship was found between the P50 latency and the time of day. However, the mean amplitude showed a maximum in the morning (9:30 am) and a minimum in the afternoon (2:30 pm). This small effect (about 7%, p < 0.001) was more pronounced for N95 and steady-state amplitudes than for P50 amplitudes (p < 0.01). Diurnal contributions to the pattern electroretinogram ranged between 3% and 10%. We conclude that pattern electroretinogram amplitude reproduces within +/- 10% with a probability of 70%. The effect size of the diurnal variation is similar and might be relevant for longitudinal studies.
Adult, Male, Fourier Analysis, Reproducibility of Results, Circadian Rhythm, Reference Values, Electroretinography, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Humans, Female, Photic Stimulation
Adult, Male, Fourier Analysis, Reproducibility of Results, Circadian Rhythm, Reference Values, Electroretinography, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Humans, Female, Photic Stimulation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 29 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
