Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Cholecystectomy and colonic cancer

Authors: D, Blanco; R K, Ross; A, Paganini-Hill; B E, Henderson;

Cholecystectomy and colonic cancer

Abstract

In a case-control study of cholecystectomy and carcinoma of the colon conducted in a residential retirement community near Los Angeles, California, no significant association was found, either for all colonic cancer (relative risk = 1.2) or by subsite (relative risk = 0.8 for right-sided colonic cancer and 1.3 for other colonic cancer). Because of this negative finding and the inconsistency of other epidemiologic studies, certain aspects of the descriptive epidemiology of colonic cancer in Los Angeles were examined to see if they were consistent with a major etiologic role for cholecystectomy. The distribution of right-sided colonic cancer by sex and race contrasted sharply with that expected, based on the known distribution of cholecystectomies in the population. Cholecystectomy is unlikely to be an important factor in the etiology of right-sided colonic cancer.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Risk, Colonic Neoplasms, Humans, Cholecystectomy, Female, California

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    43
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
43
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!