
doi: 10.1007/bf02555629
pmid: 6714043
In a case-control study of cholecystectomy and carcinoma of the colon conducted in a residential retirement community near Los Angeles, California, no significant association was found, either for all colonic cancer (relative risk = 1.2) or by subsite (relative risk = 0.8 for right-sided colonic cancer and 1.3 for other colonic cancer). Because of this negative finding and the inconsistency of other epidemiologic studies, certain aspects of the descriptive epidemiology of colonic cancer in Los Angeles were examined to see if they were consistent with a major etiologic role for cholecystectomy. The distribution of right-sided colonic cancer by sex and race contrasted sharply with that expected, based on the known distribution of cholecystectomies in the population. Cholecystectomy is unlikely to be an important factor in the etiology of right-sided colonic cancer.
Male, Risk, Colonic Neoplasms, Humans, Cholecystectomy, Female, California
Male, Risk, Colonic Neoplasms, Humans, Cholecystectomy, Female, California
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 43 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
