Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Toxic megacolon

An analysis of 70 cases
Authors: J, Heppell; E, Farkouh; S, Dubé; A, Péloquin; S, Morgan; D, Bernard;

Toxic megacolon

Abstract

The clinical features and outcome of 70 patients treated for toxic megacolon between 1970 and 1984 in five university-affiliated hospitals were determined. There were 35 women and 35 men with a mean age of 39 +/- 0.2 years. Toxic megacolon occurred at the initial episode of colitis in 43 patients (61 percent). Only five patients had a specific colitis: salmonellosis, two; ischemic, two; and pseudomembranous, one. Of the 65 remaining patients with nonspecific colitis, six had to be operated on without delay because of peritonitis. In the remaining 59 patients, toxic megacolon was cured with intensive medical management in nine (15 percent), improved temporarily in 14 (24 percent), and remained unchanged in 36 (61 percent). The postoperative mortality rate was 11 percent for all patients (6/56), 4 percent for patients without perforation (2/50) compared with 27 percent for patients with perforation (4/15). None of the patients who underwent surgery within five days of medical treatment died. When toxic megacolon was complicated by hemorrhage (nine patients) or peritonitis (eight patients), the mortality rate increased to 33 percent and 27 percent, respectively. A one-stage proctocolectomy was performed in 19 patients (32 percent). Of 32 patients in whom the rectum was retained, successful restoration of continuity was possible in only seven (22 percent) within 12 months after surgery. In well-selected patients, a plea is made for rectal preservation to offer an alternative to permanent ileostomy.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Granuloma, Adolescent, Middle Aged, Peritonitis, Prognosis, Megacolon, Toxic, Adrenal Cortex Hormones, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Intestinal Perforation, Humans, Colitis, Ulcerative, Female, Child, Colectomy, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    67
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
67
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!