Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Reliability of colonoscopy

Authors: R L, Byrd; H W, Boggs; G W, Slagle; P A, Cole;

Reliability of colonoscopy

Abstract

In an effort to determine the reliability of colonoscopy the authors retrospectively reviewed preoperative colonoscopic findings and compared them with the postoperative pathologic specimen reports. Only lesions greater than 0.5 cm were included in the comparison. Over a 13-year period, 429 patients with colorectal cancer underwent preoperative colonoscopy. Four hundred thirteen (97 percent) of the colonoscopic examinations correlated with the pathologic specimen, but, in 16 cases (3 percent), lesions were missed. In total, 17 adenomatous polyps and 3 cancers were found in the surgical specimens that were not documented at colonoscopy. Eighteen patients had total preoperative colonoscopy and total abdominal colectomy, which makes for a reliable model to judge the accuracy of colonoscopy. In these 18 patients, 17 of the pathologic specimens correlated with the endoscopic findings, which yields an accuracy rate of 94 percent. Blind areas in the colon, plus misjudgment that the scope had reached the cecum, are responsible for the majority of colonoscopic errors.

Keywords

Humans, Colonoscopy, Diagnostic Errors, Colorectal Neoplasms, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    25
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
25
Average
Top 10%
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!