Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Complications of colostomies

Authors: Robert J. Rubin; Eugene P. Salvati; Theodore E. Eisenstat; J. A. Porter;

Complications of colostomies

Abstract

One hundred twenty-six patients underwent 130 end colostomies, 44 for benign and 86 for malignant disease, and were followed for an average of 35 months. The left or sigmoid colon was used in 99 and the transverse colon in 31. Stomas were made electively in 98 patients and urgently in 32. Seventy-six stomas were brought out through the incision and 54 from separate sites. There were 69 complications in 55 patients (44 percent) including 11 strictures, 9 wound infections, 14 hernias, 9 small-bowel obstructions, 4 prolapses, 2 abscesses, 1 peristomal fistula, 17 skin erosions, and 2 poor stoma locations. Fifteen complications required reoperation. Five of these procedures included stoma revision. Total numbers of complications were not related to the stoma site, the disease process, the urgency of the procedure, or the segment of colon used. Wound infections, however, were increased in urgently made stomas. The incidence of hernia was equivalent in stomas brought out through the incision or at a separate site. Forty-one patients (30 percent) had 43 colostomies closed an average of 3.5 months after creation. Thirteen patients had 14 complications--5 wound infections, 6 hernias, 2 small-bowel obstructions, and 1 rectovaginal fistula. One patient died. Four patients required reoperation. There were no anastomotic leaks. Complications were equivalent in Hartmann closures and transverse colostomy closures. Complications were similar in stomas created for cancer and those created for diverticular disease.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Reoperation, Hernia, Middle Aged, Colonic Diseases, Postoperative Complications, Colostomy, Humans, Surgical Wound Infection, Female, Emergencies, Intestinal Obstruction, Follow-Up Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    161
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
161
Top 10%
Top 1%
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!