Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Influence of sigmoid resection on progression of diverticular disease of the colon

Authors: Robert W. Beart; Roger R. Dozois; Roger L. Ready; Robert L. MacCarty; Bruce G. Wolff;

Influence of sigmoid resection on progression of diverticular disease of the colon

Abstract

The surgeon is frequently confronted with the problem of how much colon to resect when operating on patients with colonic diverticulosis or diverticulitis. Two questions arise: will diverticulosis progress in the proximal colon if only the sigmoid is removed, and will diverticulitis recur in the more proximal diverticula? To evaluate these potential problems, the histories were reviewed of 61 patients who had elective sigmoid resection for diverticular disease and who had barium enema examinations before operation, early during the postoperative period, and at least five years later. Progression of diverticulosis was noted in only nine (14.7 per cent) patients on repeat barium-enema examination five to nine years after resection; the progression was noted to be minimal in all nine. Seven patients (11.4 per cent) had signs and symptoms of recurrent diverticulitis. Only three patients demonstrated progression of diverticulosis and recurrent diverticulitis. We see no benefit in resecting all of the diverticula-bearing colon after adequate sigmoid resection, as there is minimal progression in the diverticular process and the risk of recurrence is low.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Sigmoid Diseases, Middle Aged, Diverticulum, Colon, Prognosis, Diverticulitis, Colonic, Colon, Sigmoid, Humans, Female, Aged, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    72
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
72
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!