Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Electrocoagulation of rectal cancer

Authors: John A. Coller; Malcolm C. Veidenheimer; Marvin L. Corman; Eugene P. Hughes;

Electrocoagulation of rectal cancer

Abstract

Electrocoagulation is an effective treatment modality for localized cancer of the distal rectum. Proper selection remains the key to successful treatment. Of potentially curable patients with cancer of the rectum followed up for a median of five years, 69 per cent had no evidence of cancer at the end of the study period. Gross tumor morphology defined two distinct groups with regard to outcome after electrocoagulation. Ninety-two per cent of patients with polypoid/exophytic tumors as compared to 33 per cent of patients with ulcerative lesions had successful treatment. Based on these results, the authors believe that lesions that are exophytic represent early cancers with a low incidence of nodal spread and, as such, can be treated by electrocoagulation with confidence. As a palliative measure, the the authors found electrocoagulation to yield equivocal results.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Rectal Neoplasms, Adenocarcinoma, Middle Aged, Electrocoagulation, Methods, Humans, Female, Aged, Follow-Up Studies, Neoplasm Staging

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    57
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
57
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?