Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Primary resection and anastomosis for treatment of acute diverticulitis

Authors: A, Alanis; G K, Papanicolaou; R R, Tadros; L P, Fielding;

Primary resection and anastomosis for treatment of acute diverticulitis

Abstract

The patterns of presentation and associated treatments of 65 patients with acute perforated diverticulitis of the left colon have been reviewed. Four types of operations were identified: primary resection with anastomosis (group I, N = 29), primary resection with anastomosis and protective colostomy (group II, N = 5), primary resection with Hartmann procedure (group III, N = 26), and delayed resection three-staged procedure (group IV, N = 5). The severity of disease was also classified (stages I to IV). Postoperative mortality rates in the first two groups were lower than that of the Hartmann group (3.4 vs. 15.3 percent). The mean length of initial hospitalization was 16 +/- 1.2 days for group I, 18.2 +/- 4.4 days for group II, 19.4 +/- 2 days for group III, 26.4 +/- 4.4 days for group IV (P less than .05, t-test group IV vs. groups I, II, and III). Complications in the Hartmann group were high with a 23 percent wound infection rate and mortality after closure of colostomy and bowel reconstruction was 3.8 percent. These data demonstrate that primary resection with anastomosis is a satisfactory operation for the majority of patients with perforated diverticulitis (stages I to III), and there appears to be no clinical indication to use the three-staged operation.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Reoperation, Colon, Anastomosis, Surgical, Length of Stay, Diverticulitis, Colonic, Colonic Diseases, Postoperative Complications, Intestinal Perforation, Acute Disease, Colostomy, Preoperative Care, Methods, Humans

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    103
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
103
Top 10%
Top 1%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!