Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Lipidsarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Lipids
Article . 1978 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
Lipids
Article . 1979
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Quantitation of high density lipoproteins

Authors: J J, Albers; G R, Warnick; M C, Chenng;

Quantitation of high density lipoproteins

Abstract

AbstractThe demand for high density lipoprotein (HDL) quantitation has dramatically increased with the renewed awareness of the importance of HDL as a negative risk factor for coronary heart disease. HDL is usually estimated by specific precipitation of the non‐HDL apoB‐containing lipoproteins by polyanions and divalent cations followed by measurement of cholesterol in the supernatant. A common procedure involves precipitation with sodium heparin at 1.3 mg/ml and MnCl2 at 0.046 M (final concentrations). This method is appropriate for serum but less than ideal for plasma because of incomplete precipitation and sedimentation of the apoB‐containing lipoproteins. A two‐fold increase in Mn2+ to 0.096 M improves precipitation of the apoB‐associated lipoproteins from plasma without excessive precipitation of HDL. This modified heparin‐Mn2+ procedure gives results nearly identical to the results with the ultracentrifugal reference method (cholesterol in the d>1.063 fraction corrected for losses and the presence of apoB‐associated cholesterol). The dextran sulfate 500‐Mg2+ and the sodium phosphotungstate‐Mg2+ procedures give results consistently 2–4 mg/dl lower than does the reference method. In contrast, a heparin‐Ca2+ method gives results 5–8 mg/dl higher than does the reference method. Immunochemical analysis of apoA‐I in the precipitate and apoB in the supernatant indicates that lower values for the phosphotungstate‐Mg2+ procedure is due to partial precipitation of the A‐I‐containing lipoproteins, while higher values by the heparin‐Ca2+ method are due to incomplete precipitation of the apoB‐containing lipoproteins. Quantitation of the principal apoproteins of HDL, A‐I and A‐II, represent an important additional index of HDL concentrations and composition. Quantitation of plasma A‐I and A‐II concentrations by radial immunodiffusion indicates that women generally have higher HDL concentrations than men (women, A‐I, 135±25, A‐II, 36±6; men, A‐I, 120±20, A‐II, 33±5; mean±S.D., in mg/dl). A‐I and A‐II do not increase with age in men but show a slight increase with age in women. Estrogen increases HDL cholesterol and protein and may in part account for the higher HDL in women. The lighter density HDL subclass has a higher A‐I/A‐II ratio than the denser HDL subclass, with women generally having significantly more of the lighter HDL subclass. Density‐gradient ultracentrifugation in CsCl2 gradients indicates that HDL contains subpopulations of differing hydrated density which vary in the A‐I/A=II ratio. Immunoassay of A‐I and A‐II when used in combination with HDL cholesterol analysis is a powerful tool for studies of HDL structure, epidemiology and metabolism.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Risk, Chemical Phenomena, Coronary Disease, Middle Aged, Chemistry, Apolipoproteins, Cholesterol, Sex Factors, Methods, Humans, Female, Lipoproteins, HDL, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    145
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
145
Top 10%
Top 1%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!