
doi: 10.1007/bf02481278
To assess the usefulness of free-angle M-mode echocardiography in measuring left ventricular (LV) dimension and global systolic function. The validity of conventional M-mode echocardiography in assessing LV dimension and global systolic function is well known; the incidental angle between the M-mode cursor and true LV minor axis diameter, however is a potential cause of measurement error. Free-angle M-mode echocardiography may overcome the limitation of M-mode cursor arrangement in conventional M-mode echocardiography. Thirteen normal volunteers and 10 patients in whom abnormal left ventricular wall motion was not detected by echocardiography (mean age, 53±17 years) were enrolled in this study. Conventional and free-angle M-mode echocardiographic images of the LV were obtained by echocardiography (ALOKA SSD-5500) using a 2.5-MHz transducer, and the LV end-diastolic (LVDd) and end-systolic (LVDs) dimensions were measured by the leading edge method. LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes were calculated using a formula by Teichholz, and the LV ejection fraction (LVEF) was obtained. Data from conventional M-mode echocardiography and free-angle M-mode echocardiography were then compared. Measurements obtained with conventional M-mode and free-angle M-mode echocaardiography were strongly correlated. Correlation coefficients for LVDd, LVDs, and LVEF were 0.98, 0.98, and 0.96, respectively (p<0.001 in each case). Assessment of left ventricular dimension, and global systolic function with free-angle M-mode can be as accurate as conventional M-mode in subjects in whom left ventricular wall motion abnormality is not detectable by echocardiogram. Moreover, when there is improper M-mode cursor direction in conventional echocardiography, free-angle M-mode echocardiography can assess global left ventricular systolic function more accurately and conveniently than conventional M-mode echocardiography.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
