Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Surgery Todayarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Surgery Today
Article . 1989 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

The clinical value of serum CA15-3 assay postoperatively in breast cancer patients

Authors: S, Kobayashi; H, Iwase; S, Karamatsu; K, Matsuo; A, Masaoka; T, Miyagawa;

The clinical value of serum CA15-3 assay postoperatively in breast cancer patients

Abstract

Serum carbohydrate antigen (CA15-3) values were examined in 300 normal subjects in order to determine the standard value of this antigen. The clinical relevance of repeatedly assaying this marker in patients with or without recurrent breast cancer postoperatively was compared with assaying the serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) values. The upper limit of CA15-3 was calculated as being 25.3 U/ml in the normal subjects and the distributions of CA15-3 values were not markedly different among the normal subjects, even if they had been selected according to sex or age. Moreover, no differences were observed among normal women who had been randomly selected according to the age distribution of the breast cancer patients. Thirty samples taken from the breast cancer patients postoperatively revealed values of higher than 25 U/ml and 73 samples showed lower levels. The serum CEA values were positive in 16 samples and negative in 85 samples. Although the accuracy of the CEA assay was about 10 per cent higher than that of the CA15-3 assay, its low positive rate was unsatisfactory for effective use in the breast clinic. The results of this study suggest that serum CA15-3 is not detectable unless there is a relatively large number of tumor cells. The higher false positive rate of the CA15-3 assay should therefore be considered as suggesting recurrence.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Humans, Antigens, Tumor-Associated, Carbohydrate, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Middle Aged, Carcinoembryonic Antigen

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    7
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
7
Average
Top 10%
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!