
doi: 10.1007/bf02469379
pmid: 7109358
A simple and quantitative scoring system for evaluating shock was proposed on the analysis of signs, symptoms and laboratory data on 62 patients diagnosed as being in shock. Five clinical features such as systolic blood pressure, pulse rate, hourly urinary output, base excess and mental state, representing functions of vital organs, were graded into 4 stages. A score from 0 to 3 was given to the each feature, according to the severity. The summing up 5 scores was named "shock score." All patients showed a shock score of over 5 points with a mean of 8.0 +/- 0.3 (X +/- SE).
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Shock, Cardiogenic, Blood Pressure, Shock, Middle Aged, Shock, Hemorrhagic, Shock, Septic, Humans, Female, Pulse, Aged
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Shock, Cardiogenic, Blood Pressure, Shock, Middle Aged, Shock, Hemorrhagic, Shock, Septic, Humans, Female, Pulse, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
