
doi: 10.1007/bf02466515
In order to collect urinary samples from unrestrained guinea pigs, animals were kept in their familiar home cages with wood shavings for bedding. Cortisol was removed from shavings by a simple washing step, and an attempt was made to measure its concentrations by high performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC), high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), or thin layer chromatography/radioimmunoassay (TLC-RIA). After intramuscular administration of 25 mg cortisol, cortisol excretion increased from about 20–30 μg/day to 400–500 μg/day (HPTLC: 531 μg/day, HPLC: 493 μg/day; TLC-RIA: 394 μg/day). Similarly, the treatment of the animals with 20 IU ACTH resulted in an augmented cortisol excretion, with mean values of 294 μg/day (HPTLC), 256 μg/day (HPLC) and 143 μg/day (TLC-RIA), respectively. The present study shows, for the first time, that cortisol excretion in unrestrained laboratory animals can be determined. Whilst the cortisol values measured by HPTLC and HPLC agree, the amounts measured by TLC-RIA were significantly lower. These differences are probably due to the presence of substances in urine or shavings which interfere with the radioimmunological determination. Hence, cortisol should be determined either by HPTLC or HPLC. Beside having a desirable specificity, these methods are more suited than TLC/RIA for steroid analysis since they confer the possibility of measuring additional steroids (e.g. precursors and/or metabolites of cortisol) in a single urine extract. This is especially the case for the HPTLC method since substances can be transformed into fluorescent derivatives.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
