
doi: 10.1007/bf02418996
pmid: 7458666
A discussion of the applicability of in vitro techniques now available for research in prenatal toxicology is presented. Advantages and disadvantages of the various in vitro methods (such as cultivation of preimplantation embryos, whole embryo culture, and organ culture) as applied to various problems of experimental research are described. As a typical example, the experience gained in our laboratory with the organ culture of mammalian limb buds is detailed. Various aspects of the research with this type of organ culture - e.g., different techniques of culturing, extent of differentiation achieved in culture, induction of abnormalities in culture, supplementing the system with drug-metabolizing capacities and means for quantification of the data - are discussed. It is concluded that certain in vitro techniques using mammalian embryonic tissues are very suitable tools for elucidating the mode of action of teratogenic agents, and that they may serve as a "model" for several basic processes also for the situation probably existing in humans. Such organ culture, and other in vitro methods, provide little, if any advantage over in vivo experiments if a "mass screening" of a possible teratogenic potential of chemicals (hazards for the human population) is attempted.
Time Factors, Limb Deformities, Congenital, Abnormalities, Drug-Induced, Cell Differentiation, Extremities, Embryo, Mammalian, Rats, Mice, Organ Culture Techniques, Teratogens, Pregnancy, Animals, Female, Biotransformation
Time Factors, Limb Deformities, Congenital, Abnormalities, Drug-Induced, Cell Differentiation, Extremities, Embryo, Mammalian, Rats, Mice, Organ Culture Techniques, Teratogens, Pregnancy, Animals, Female, Biotransformation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 30 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
