
doi: 10.1007/bf02307415
pmid: 8748793
Somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) have been used to help minimize neurologic morbidity during spinal surgery. While this is a sensory test it has been used as an inference of motor function. The failure to always achieve the latter goal has resulted in some pessimism regarding the value of this test. In this series of 161 operations in 150 patients, it was demonstrated that SSEPs were recordable under anesthesia in 87% of patients. Of these patients, 12% had their spinal surgery interrupted due to significant neurophysiologic changes; of these patients, 18% had new neurologic deficits postoperatively. There were no cases with new neurologic deficits who had no changes in their SSEPs. It was concluded that SSEP monitoring may be helpful in identifying potentially neurologically threatening surgical maneuvers in a significant number of patients.
Neurologic Examination, Afferent Pathways, Electroencephalography, Electric Stimulation, Median Nerve, Postoperative Complications, Spinal Fusion, Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory, Monitoring, Intraoperative, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Reaction Time, Humans, Spinal Diseases, Tibial Nerve
Neurologic Examination, Afferent Pathways, Electroencephalography, Electric Stimulation, Median Nerve, Postoperative Complications, Spinal Fusion, Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory, Monitoring, Intraoperative, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Reaction Time, Humans, Spinal Diseases, Tibial Nerve
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 17 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
