
doi: 10.1007/bf02300615
The results indicate that there appears to be no substantial differences between the buy-and-hold and the fixed proportion strategies regardless of whether an equal allocation scheme or a quadratic programming allocation scheme is employed. Also, when comparing the equal allocation scheme with the quadratic programming allocation scheme on either a buy-and-hold or fixed proportion maintenance strategy, no obvious differences persist. However, the primary focus of this paper was to gain insight into theex post performance of the quadratic programming variable proportions strategy. This latter strategy appears to be far superior to the others — providing greater returns with somewhat less variability. Thus this strategy may provide portfolio managers the where-withal to improve portfolio performance. Future research using other time periods and other samples of securities is necessary to adequately generalize these preliminary results.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
