
doi: 10.1007/bf02284680
We are honored to have such a well-respected economist as William G. Shepherd comment on our work and are grateful to have the opportunity to respond to his concerns. Shepherd has three main points. First, he argues that citations are a more reliable index of research performance than are page counts. Second, he claims that our sample of journals is inappropriate because it includes extraneous journals and excludes important industrial organization journals. Third, Shepherd contends that our study inappropriately pools mainstream industrial organization research with "new IO theory." The following sections address these criticisms.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
