
doi: 10.1007/bf02245462
pmid: 7846202
This paper argues for consistency in the conceptualization and definition of drug-induced akathisia (DIA), something found lacking in published research reports. It suggests the adoption of a common set of provisional categories with operationally defined diagnostic criteria. The categories proposed are acute, tardive, withdrawal and chronic DIA, with overlap of chronic DIA with the other three. The prerequisites for diagnosis are drug exposure, the presence of characteristic clinical features and the exclusion of non-drug causes. The frequency of the clinical features, and their nature, determine the level of certainty. A decision regarding severity is made independently of diagnostic certainty. Some ways of testing the usefulness and validity of these definitions are discussed.
Terminology as Topic, Humans, Akathisia, Drug-Induced
Terminology as Topic, Humans, Akathisia, Drug-Induced
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 59 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
