Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Giant colonic diverticulum

Report of four cases and review of the literature
Authors: C K, Choong; F A, Frizelle;

Giant colonic diverticulum

Abstract

Giant colonic diverticulum are rare, with 103 reported cases in 95 patients. The experience of any one surgeon is limited. We aimed to retrospectively review our experience and to review the literature on origin, pathology, and management of this rare and unusual problem.Cases were identified by review of pathologic database and by computerized audit from three hospitals.Five giant colonic diverticulum were identified in four patients, and the pathology and management were reviewed.A definition and classification system of giant colonic diverticulum is suggested. Giant colonic diverticulum should be the universal term to cover all colonic diverticulum larger than 4 cm, and we suggest that there are two types based on histology. Literature review reveals 103 reported cases in 95 patients. Type I (87 percent) is a pseudodiverticulum, perhaps related to conventional diverticular disease, whereas Type II (13 percent) is a true diverticulum, which is probably a type of communicating cystic congenital duplication. These lesions tend to occur in the sigmoid colon (93 percent) and present with complications similar to conventional diverticular disease. In the presence of conventional diverticular disease, consideration should be given to anterior resection, and in the absence, diverticulectomy should be considered.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Aged, 80 and over, Male, Colon, Middle Aged, Diverticulum, Colon, Diagnosis, Differential, Colostomy, Humans, Female, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Aged, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    98
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
98
Top 10%
Top 1%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!