Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Low rectal cancer

Impact of radiation and chemotherapy on surgical treatment
Authors: A, Habr-Gama; P M, de Souza; U, Ribeiro; W, Nadalin; R, Gansl; A H, Sousa; F G, Campos; +1 Authors

Low rectal cancer

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy (leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil) on the treatment of potentially resectable low rectal cancer using the following end points: 1) toxicity of this combined modality regimen; 2) clinical and pathologic response rate and local control; 3) down-staging of the tumor and its influence on the number of sphincter-saving operations; 4) disease-free interval, patterns of relapse, and overall survival.From 1991 to 1996, 118 patients with potentially resectable cases of histologically proven adenocarcinoma and no distant metastases were enrolled into this protocol. All patients were evaluated by clinical and proctologic examination, abdominal computed tomography, transrectal ultrasound, and chest radiography. Therapy consisted of 5,040 cGy (6 weeks) and concurrent leucovorin (20/mg/m2/day) with bolus doses of 5-fluorouracil administered intravenously at 425 mg/m2/day for three consecutive days on the first and last three days of radiation therapy. After two months, all patients underwent repeat evaluation and biopsy of any suspected residual lesions or scar tissue.Median follow-up was 36 months. Toxicity of chemotherapy regimen was minimum. Thirty-six patients (30.5 percent) were classified as being complete responders. In six of these patients, complete response was confirmed by the absence of tumor in the surgical specimens (3 abdominoperineal resections and 3 proctosigmoidectomies with coloanal anastomosis). In the remaining 30 patients, confirmation of a complete response was made by the absence of symptoms, negative findings on physical examination, and biopsy, transrectal ultrasound, and pelvic computed tomographic test results during follow-up. Eighty-two patients (69.4 percent) were considered incomplete responders. Residual lesions had already been identified during the first examination in 74 patients. In the other eight patients, residual tumor was only identified after 3 to 14 months. All patients underwent surgical treatment, except one patient who refused surgery. Eighty-seven patients underwent 90 surgical procedures: local excision, 9; coloanal anastomosis, 36; abdominoperineal resection, 4; Hartmann's procedure, 1. Isolated local recurrences occurred in five patients (4.3 percent) and combined local and distant failure in eight patients (6.7 percent). Ninety patients are alive and disease-free at a median follow-up of 36 months.Combined up-front chemoradiotherapy was associated with tolerable and acceptable side effects. A significant number of patients had complete disappearance of their tumors (30.5 percent) within a median follow-up of 36 months. This regimen spared 26.2 percent of patients from surgical treatment and allowed sphincter-saving management in 38.1 percent of patients who may have required abdominoperineal resection. Preliminary results of this trial suggests a reduction in the number of local recurrences and reinforces the concept that infiltrative low rectal cancer may be initially treated by chemoradiotherapy.

Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Rectal Neoplasms, Anastomosis, Surgical, Leucovorin, Adenocarcinoma, Middle Aged, Combined Modality Therapy, Survival Analysis, Survival Rate, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Humans, Female, Radiotherapy, Adjuvant, Fluorouracil, Prospective Studies, Aged, Follow-Up Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    313
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
313
Top 1%
Top 1%
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!