
doi: 10.1007/bf02190738
pmid: 7654787
Available data (this review includes old major articles and recent articles) show that, although results are heterogeneous, methadone maintenance treatments (MMTs) have a real efficiency not only to reduce illicit opiate abuse (50-80% of patients under MMT did not use heroin in the preceding month) but also to reduce criminality, HIV risks and mortality, and to improve social rehabilitation, without inducing other alternative substance abuse. A minority of patients (perhaps 5-20%) stay on MMT on a very long-term basis (more than 10 years). Efficiency of MMTs are rather poorly related to patients' variables, with the exception of a moderately deleterious effect of a low age at onset of opiate dependence, a precocious or high involvement in criminality and an abuse of non-opiate drugs. On the other hand, variables related to treatment play a more important role in explaining heterogeneity of results. Optimal daily dose, high quality of medical and psycho-social services, clear orientation towards social rehabilitation and treatment retention (to allow a sufficient duration of treatment) and slow detoxification regimen of well-stabilized patients are all factors contributing to better results.
Narcotics, Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Marital Status, Substance-Related Disorders, Age Factors, Prognosis, Sex Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, HIV Seropositivity, Humans, Patient Compliance, Crime, Methadone
Narcotics, Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Marital Status, Substance-Related Disorders, Age Factors, Prognosis, Sex Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, HIV Seropositivity, Humans, Patient Compliance, Crime, Methadone
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 114 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
